There has always been a fine line of ambivalence between fine art and pornography. The colloquial performances of carnal acts previously dictated by the social culture that it resides in, from historical context to contemporary times. Human forms interact with one another, as forms in sexual nuances viewed by conservative circles, deemed as immoral. That has become an antiquated idea, most notably in modern times, invasive; this is western philosophy established by purist right wing dictators to push their bias agendas. Moral panic of sexual acts coined deviant behavior to maintain subordination in continuing classic hegemonic rule.
The pictorial notion of a sexual act resides as two individuals fornicating and culminating in sexual intercourse. There seems to be a consensus of two individuals being not only monogamous but also a perception of love-injected therein. This impression although shared globally, is, however, a mechanism of control, agreeable there are people who share this ideology; though there are other groups that can distinguish and compartmentalize love and sex. Sexual intercourse between two males has existed since the dawn of time, despite what religious factions dictate immoral. Sexual acts have been a phallocentric notion and connected to heteronormative stances, the later only falls to religious doctrines. Shaming or being divisive on the matters of personal interest is an outmoded ideology deriving from myopic individuals with psychological problems.